Archive for the ‘News’ Category

My alma mater censors a book

Thursday, December 11th, 2008

Hello there.

I’ve been recovering from yet another bout of illness, this time necessitating a brief stay in the hospital. (The food there was awful, I must say!) Anyway, that is to explain my recent absence, and I must admit I’m not yet up to updating regularly.

But there are more important things afoot: My alma mater, New Rochelle High School, has removed pages from Susanna Kaysen’s Girl, Interrupted, which seniors are reading in class. The offending pages? Mentioned oral sex.

Oh noes! S-E-X? The horror!

Now look here: There are plenty of teen books that are much more graphic than Girl, Interrupted, which is really a fantastic memoir about struggling with borderline personality disorder — although I must admit I disagree with some of Kaysen’s conclusions, it’s a good book and a fascinating read.

I don’t disagree with her inclusion of the topic of S-E-X, though. Because, let’s face it: teens know about these things. Indeed, when I was a wee girl of seventeen — a very bratty one, too — my health teacher went into quite a lot of detail about various sexual acts. Of course she provided these details so that we students would be able to protect ourselves from STIs, but she provided the info nonetheless.

And you know, not everything we read in high school was so very chaste. I vividly remember a discussion about The Turn of the Screw by Henry James, in which some of us couldn’t help but wonder if the book featured a woman having … err … improper relations with a young boy. There was also the day, when I was a lass of fourteen, that my English teacher stood in the hallway ringing a bell and shouting, “It’s the sex scene! It’s the sex scene!” because we were watching Romeo and Juliet (the awesome seventies version) and our teacher wanted to make sure everyone was in attendance that day. When we did indeed watch the sex scene.

We watched Schindler’s List, too, unedited. And we read other inflammatory books.

The school administration’s decision to bowdlerize a book is not something I appreciate. Ripping pages out? Really? This is what you do to protect teenagers? And from what, exactly?

I should mention that New Rochelle, New York is a rather liberal city. It’s not a bit podunk or backwater or anything like that. And I don’t recall there being any censorship issues with the school newspaper or the school literary magazine when I was there oh-so-many years ago.

Which makes it even more disappointing that the district would rip pages out of a book.

But let’s face it: censorship is a rite of passage. All our favorite teen authors have been banned somewhere by someone. When Rachel Vail wrote recently of her children’s book being banned, I was of half a mind to congratulate her and half a mind to console her.

Although, at the end of the day, the “rite of passage” argument doesn’t make it any less frustrating that people can be closed-minded and, frankly, idiotic.

ml,
brina

What I Saw and How I Lied by Judy Blundell

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008

I read this book awhile back, and to be honest, I wasn’t sure I was going to review it.

But author Judy Blundell won the National Book Award for What I Saw and How I Lied, and so, you know … a review it is.

We begin our journey in Queens, New York in 1947. Evie, a teenager who seems to have too many angles and not enough curves, is hoping that life will return to normal now that her stepfather is back from the war. Instead, he acts moody, receives strange phone calls, and then takes the family on a spur-of-the-moment vacation to Palm Beach, Florida. The bulk of the story unfolds as Evie and her parents meet various people at the hotel, including the handsome Peter Coleridge, who served in the army with Evie’s stepdad.

The book deals with a lot of important issues: anti-Semitism, sex, coming of age … and, of course, lies. There are all sorts of twists and turns in this story, and it’s sure to make readers feel a lot of things: lust, jealousy, fear, anger … if you haven’t yet read the novel, I assure you your feelings will run the gamut.

… But. Oh, you knew there’d be a but, didn’t you? And with me, there is almost never a but. I suppose I feel like I missed something hugely important and incredibly brilliant. It’s like I’m in high school all over again, reading Nathaniel Hawthorne or F. Scott Fitzgerald and asking the teacher if we know the author meant to put all that symbolism in there, or if we just see it as a result of a million years of over-analyzing. (I can say now that I’m fairly certain my teachers were not trying to pull one over on me, but back then I felt certain that they were.)

So I must have missed something vital, and that’s how I’ve been feeling about this novel since I first read it. It’s enjoyable, yes. Although the ’40s lingo grates on my nerves a bit (“It’s not all polka dots and moonbeams” — a choice example, along with lots of ’40s-esque words like “jeepers” and “keen.”)

Still, I can’t say it’s not a good book.

And obviously it’s quite good, or it wouldn’t have beaten out my personal top two picks, The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks by E. Lockhart and Chains by Laurie Halse Anderson, for this year’s National Book Award.

It is time, I think, that I sit down and re-read this thing (again), and I’m just going to keep going until I’m madly in love with What I Saw and How I Lied. Right now, I’m definitely in like, but not in love.

But you know, I always want to hear your opinions. So let’s start with this: Have you read the book? Did you love it? If you did, what did you love about it? And if you’ve read any of this year’s other finalists in addition to Judy Blundell’s work, tell me who your top pick was. (If you want to go even deeper, tell me what book should have been a finalist and wasn’t.) Also, zombies or unicorns?

Authors and illness

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

I just read this article by Lucy Maud Montgomery’s granddaughter, telling the world that the great novelist suffered from depression and eventually took her own life. It’s a sad story, especially when you put it in context: She died in 1942, during the second world war. She had written, during the first world war, that to see the entire world at war was too painful to watch. (This is a paraphrase; I can find exact quotes later on.) She was deeply depressed, as am I, and she was the wife of a conservative minister, and she didn’t have the resources we have now. A variety of medications, sympathetic and knowledgeable doctors, and most importantly, good friends who understand that mental illness is not a character flaw.

I have an entire shelf in my bookcase devoted to her writing. She was, without a doubt, the most influential author I read during my childhood. You know that feeling you have, especially when you’re very young, that certain authors are like friends to you? That if you ever met them, you’re sure they would be kindred spirits, because their stories capture you entirely? That is how I felt about LM Montgomery growing up, and I feel it even more today.

Dot Lin from Tor Books sent me this link, and it couldn’t have come at a better time for me, as right now I’m sitting at the bottom of a giant hole. What is amazing is that, in spite of her illness, Lucy Maud achieved so much. She wrote wonderful books and connected with generations of readers.

So for today, all I have to say is this: Read the article. And then go back and re-read some of Lucy Maud’s best work. If you haven’t read anything by her, start with the Anne books and go through the first three at the very least. Otherwise, try the Emily trilogy. You won’t regret it.

Gone fishing …

Thursday, September 25th, 2008

Sorry for the long absence; I’ve been ill and still am. Actually, I shall soon be returning to my bed, where an IV drip of YA fiction awaits me. But I’ve got a bunch of reviews and interviews coming your way as soon as I’m back up and around and back to my normal peppy self.

Speaking of which, I’m looking for a second writer for this here site. If you’re interested, shoot me an e-mail with some info about your reading habits, writing creds (blogs count!) and maybe a sample review or a link to your own site. I’d especially love to have someone on board who is interested in graphic novels, manga, and any other YA stuff you think the site needs more of. Last thing: You don’t need to live in New York if you want to join up in this volunteer effort. You can live anywhere. Alaska. Oklahoma. Finland. Etc.

Back soon, and much love,
brina

YA for Obama

Friday, September 19th, 2008

Not to get too political on y’all, but Maureen Johnson has started an online networking group called YA for Obama. I’ve been staying away from politics this election cycle, not because I don’t care but because I want to make sure everyone feels welcome at YA New York. But the thing is, folks who write teen fiction tend to be somewhat political. And they’re often somewhat liberal, which is why there are a lot of cool authors with informed opinions on Maureen’s site, which officially launches on Sept. 22.

Want more? Click on the little ad below:


Visit YA for Obama

Scott Westerfeld interviews Robin Wasserman

Monday, September 15th, 2008

Dude. Scott’s interview with Robin Wasserman (author of Skinned, of course) way outshines my own. So I’m going to link to his for now and post mine later in the week.

Go read it!

The Wizengamot’s ruling

Tuesday, September 9th, 2008

The New York Times has printed a thorough article about JK Rowling winning her lawsuit against Steven Jan Vander Ark, who has run the Harry Potter Lexicon for years.

It’s a little sad, because Vander Ark tried to publish a book based on his work on the HP Lexicon, and a judge found it had almost no original material. But I remember how useful his website was when I was prepping for books six and seven of Rowling’s series. For instance, I couldn’t figure out exactly how old various members of the Weasley family were, and the Lexicon pointed me in the right direction. It is, for all intents and purposes, a sort of encyclopedia of the Harry Potter world.

I do not know much about the contents of Vander Ark’s book, but I do know that I appreciated his site when I was reading the series. And, if I remember correctly — I could be wrong on this — Rowling linked to the website way back when as a fan site she appreciated.

Of course, if he was attempting to profit from her work, that’s not cool. But there is a certain amount of work involved in piecing together all this information, and in trying to be as accurate as possible, because the books often left us wondering. Wait, exactly how old are Charlie and Bill? That would make Molly and Arthur how many years older than Harry’s parents?

The website was a good resource for fans, though I honestly don’t see the point of publishing a book now, when no amateur sleuths are trying to figure out what will happen in the next book.

It would have been nice if Vander Ark could have tried to work with JKR instead of going ahead and publishing a book containing her life’s work without her permission. And I honestly don’t know what really happened, especially with the book’s contents, except that it ended in court. Which is extremely unfortunate. It seems — though I could be wrong here — that Vander Ark had good intentions, but was unclear on where the line was drawn on intellectual property rights. Which, umm, is why he needed an agent. And a publisher that knew copyright law backwards and forwards. And a bunch of other things.

I don’t know. What do you think?

Okay, how did I miss this?

Sunday, September 7th, 2008

Holy freaking cow. I’ve been avoiding my RSS feeds for awhile now — they get overwhelming sometimes — and this is what I miss???

What makes you “a person suitable to work with or be associated with children”? And this is not to offend those at RH, which has published quite a lot of books I adore, and which I hope will continue to do so. But … how does the publisher decide what is morally objectionable? Like, does smoking cigarettes make you unsuitable to be around kids, ’cause cigarettes are bad and they cause cancer and if you smoke in front of kids then the kids might think it’s cool and go try to get cancer themselves? Or what about something really controversial? What if you’re (a) not Christian or (b) gay or (c) a recovering alcoholic? Would one of these things disqualify you from writing YA?

I don’t think so. I mean, I think that’s one of those things that gives us stories to tell. When we ourselves struggle with addiction, or religion, or sexual identity — just to name a few of many, many possible struggle-y things … well, that’s when we pony up, right? That’s what gives us perspective. And in part, that’s what makes a writer.

I don’t know. I’ve only read these two articles about it, that I linked to. If you’ve got more info or other blog links, send ‘em on over. I’m keen to hear what has been going on around all this. And I, likewise, will update you if I hear anything, and I’ll probably weigh in later with a few good examples of books RH has published that at least grapple with these sorts of issues.

UPDATE: According to one of our awesome commenters, this RH problem exists only in Europe. Thank God. We Americans are much too depraved to be able to live up to a morality clause. Or maybe we just have much stricter ideas of morality. Like, in the US you can be immoral for almost anything, depending on who you ask. Whereas in Europe, I’m pretty sure they’re more interested in the hard-core stuff, like Big Bad Drugs and crimes that would get you locked up for several years.

Oprah demolishes the ghetto

Saturday, August 23rd, 2008

Everyone’s been buzzing for a little while now about Oprah’s teen book club. It’s an awesome thing, and I’m so, so very glad she has chosen to recognize teen writers. It’s like saying, “YA Ghetto? What YA Ghetto? Do you mean the fabulous world of YA, which is totally worthy of your attention?”

Not to mention that the woman has good taste. Her picks include … (more…)

Harry Potter movie delay: Complaints go here

Friday, August 15th, 2008

So the film version of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince has been delayed to July 2009. When I found out, I was all, “Did they not finish production or something? Is there a problem???”

No:

Allen Horn, president and COO, Warner Bros.:

Our reasons for shifting ‘Half-Blood Prince’ to summer are twofold: we know the summer season is an ideal window for a family tent pole release, as proven by the success of our last Harry Potter film, which is the second-highest grossing film in the franchise, behind only the first installment. Additionally, like every other studio, we are still feeling the repercussions of the writers’ strike, which impacted the readiness of scripts for other films–changing the competitive landscape for 2009 and offering new windows of opportunity that we wanted to take advantage of. We agreed the best strategy was to move ‘Half-Blood Prince’ to July, where it perfectly fills the gap for a major tent pole release for mid-summer.”

(Article.)

Dude. This is a financial decision? And you said so? Out loud? Wow. That’s just kind of … umm … stupid.

According to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, 15,900 fans have already signed a petition asking Warner Bros. to keep the original release date (November). Now, I’m all about fans working for change or whatever, but … also stupid. Because, no offense, I don’t think it’s going to change stuff. Still, you know. The petition is here, and actually as of this writing the number of signatures is up past 17,000. You can sign or not. I don’t care much …

Because these movies generally suck. Except for the third one. But Half-Blood Prince is my favorite HP book, and I would be distressed if it turned out to be another stiff translation from the page to the screen. (Though of course I’ll go anyway.)

Oh, and maybe you’ve heard about the video game Electronic Arts has been planning to go launch at the same time as the movie (that is, November)? They haven’t decided what to do. Wait. Who plays these games, anyway? Are the HP games any good? Wasn’t this one supposed to be … maybe … decent?

No word about either from JK Rowling on her site. Oh, but are you psyched to read The Tales of Beedle the Bard? I kind of want the Collector’s Edition, which is one of those Amazon.com-only exclusives. But it does look shiny. And it’s only, you know … what??? A hundred bucks? Oh. Maybe someone will get me a Chrismannukkah gift, or something. Hmph. Although it is for charity, I suppose. Still …

All around, HP news not very cheerful today. (Not that it should be. Isn’t this series, like, over???)

(Our super-awesome LA and film correspondent, Jami B., weighs in in comments.)