YA LA does Twilight Midnight Madness

November 21st, 2008

All right, folks. I was there at 12:01 a.m., when the film adaptation of Stephanie Meyer’s inescapable Twilight finally rolled out at movie theaters across North America this morning. Surrounded by rabid fangirls, Twilight Moms, and bemused theater employees, I procured my seat, grabbed some Diet Pepsi and M&Ms, and I got ready to be dazzled …

Twilight is a very accurate adaptation. The plot never sways too far from the source, and lines of dialogue and narration have been pulled directly from the novel. The scenery and location shots are pitch perfect. Bella, as portrayed by Kristen Stewart, is done well. And the film is fun – funner than I expected. For such a heavy (even, dare I say, melodramatic?) story, director Catherine Hardwicke really made time for light hearted moments, and these snippets (Bella shopping for prom dresses with her classmates, or the parade of local Forks boys that try to catch her eye, for example) balance the darker elements of the film. The complicated relationship that Bella has with her father, Charlie, is also handled respectfully. In fact, at times, I found myself more interested in that relationship than in the Romeo & Juliet plot.

Read the rest of this entry »

Twilight begins

November 21st, 2008

Since I am awake at this unearthly hour, I thought I’d round up some reviews of Twilight, the movie. (By the by, I am no longer a Stephenie Meyer virgin. And while I’m not a rabid fan, I did find the first two books enjoyable. I have yet to read the third and fourth, but mean to do so quite soon.)

Back to the subject, there are quite a few reviews of this film, which it seems is attracting every red-blooded American teenager.

My favorite critic, Owen Gleiberman of Entertainment Weekly, calls the film “sodden” and “prosaic,” but faults the book upon which it is based more than he does the director or actors.

The Houston Chronicle’s headline? “Twilight goes for beauty over substance.

The Cleveland Plain Dealer says the movie is “better than the book,” but isn’t effervescent in its praise. However, the reviewer does liken the film to “a midnight buffet at the blood bank.”

The Washington Examiner calls the flick “anemic,” as does the Sacramento Bee.

And then there’s the New York Times — not really my first choice for movie reviews, but this one may be worth your time. According to the NYT, Robert Pattinson is a bore, and the movie — apparently like the books — is brimming over with a message of abstinence above all. (Oddly, I didn’t get that impression from book one, but I can see why others would categorize the books that way.)

Our fabulous LA correspondent, the lovely Jami B., will be watching the movie this weekend, and then doing one of the things she does best: she’ll review it for us. (Jami and I were college buds, and I have to say she was always good for a killer film review. The girl knows what she is talking about when it comes to movies, especially teen movies.) I too will be attending, so Jami and I will go head to head this weekend, bringing you as much Twilight news as is fit to print.

As for me? I’m going to watch mainly because I adored Kristen Stewart in Speak, the film version of Laurie Halse Anderson’s impeccable book. The casting — other than Kristen as Bella — has had me a bit riled for some time, but maybe the movie will cure me of that.

By the way, for those of you who read Go Fug Yourself, answer me this: WHY does Robert Pattinson seem to think that “slovenly” and “handsomely rumpled” are the same thing? The guy clearly needs some lessons on personal hygiene. Or at least on how to dress in public. Or maybe just a haircut?

After you watch the movie, feel free to share your own reviews in comments. On this post or on any of the ones that are sure to follow. C’mon, you know you’ve all had your tickets for ages. You wouldn’t miss this for the world — even if you’re loathe to admit it. So tell us what you thought. Only one thing: No spoilers!

Much love,
brina

Twenty-One Questions with Matthue Roth

November 19th, 2008

Matthue Roth is the author of Losers, a fantastic novel about a dorky Russian boy named Jupiter, who somehow goes from being smashed into lockers to crashing parties to hanging at the hippest Philadelphia cafes, all in a few chapters. It’s a fascinating book, which I highly recommended not too long ago.

Matthue has also written several other novels, a memoir, poetry and music, much of which is about his Jewish heritage and religion. Which means we had a ton to talk about. Without further ado …

Question One

Me: Can you tell us a little bit about Losers, the book, not the people?

Matthue: Basically, my first book, Nevermind the Goldbergs, was my kind of idealized fantasy of the person that I’d like to be, if the person I’d like to be was a seventeen-year-old girl. … Jupiter is everything that I was at seventeen, although more so: He’s totally socially awkward, has relationships that exist entirely in his head, and he lives in a factory.
Read the rest of this entry »

The DeVouring by Simon Holt

November 17th, 2008

It’s no secret that I have Opinions about assembly-line books. You know the kind, devised by old white men sitting around a board table.

“What do the kids these days want? Rich, naughty Upper East Side school girls! Rich, naughty Upper East Side school girls who are also vampires! Rich, naughty Upper East school girls from the nineteenth century! Yes!”

The old white men agree that this is what kids today want, and then an editor writes up an outline and sends it off to a starving writer who is desperate to be published.

It makes me cry. I have this whole concept of the-writer-as-artist in my mind, of the book as a baby borne of its author’s imagination and ink, and I suppose that’s old-fashioned.

But the worst part is … sometimes these books end up being good. Case in point, Simon Holt’s The DeVouring. Read the rest of this entry »

Twilight invitation

November 14th, 2008

No, my friends, I am not inviting you to go see an all-star special screening of Twilight with me. This is because I myself have not received any such invitation.

HOWEVER, I am inviting you to send me your pictures. If you go to the film on opening night, e-mail me pics of the crowd. I want to see any and all wackiness, from lines extending down three blocks to people in vampire and werewolf outfits to … well, you get the idea. I’ll post the best pics here on YA New York. Please be sure to include you names (or your internet handles) and locations, so I can give you attribution. A short description wouldn’t go awry, either.

Now, it’s the weekend. I may or may not be attending one or more events this weekend, and I may or may not tell you about them come Monday. For now, everyone go re-read E. Lockhart’s The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks.

Much love,
brina

Book of the Year: The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks by E. Lockhart

November 13th, 2008

Darlings,

I just couldn’t wait any longer. I know the year is not yet over, but I’ve received galleys taking me all the way up through the end of December, and while there have been many, many fantastic books this year, none have captivated me as much as E. Lockhart’s incredible story of a 15-year-old girl who crosses social boundaries when she infiltrates an all-boys’ secret society.

Frankie begins her sophomore year at Alabaster Preparatory Academy and is almost instantly noticed by one of the hottest guys on campus — one who never seemed to know she existed the previous year, though she crushed on him even then. It’s an auspicious start to the school year: she is “in” with the most goofy, glamorous, interesting crowd on campus. Only she isn’t, really. Because she is nothing more than a girlfriend. She can never be a full member of the tribe, and she knows her boyfriend is keeping secrets from her. He asks her not to be so “sensitive,” tells her how cute she is, and generally treats her like gold.

But Frankie isn’t satisfied. She wants to be known as brilliant and funny. She wants to be respected. And so she infiltrates the Loyal Order of the Basset Hounds, a secret society to which her own father once belonged.

The Disreputable History gets right to the heart of what it means to be only a girl, even in these supposedly liberated times. But while Lockhart explores social issues that we could debate for hours on end, her work is by no means overwrought. It’s funny, insightful, and honestly the best book I’ve read this year. Indeed, it’s one of the best books I’ve ever read. (The evidence of this novel’s awesomeness is quite compelling, and clearly an opinion shared by many others: not only did Oprah choose The Disreputable History as one of her inaugural picks for her teen book club, but the novel is also a National Book Award finalist.)

Back in the good old days, I wrote a newspaper column on the best “trashy” books out there. I focused mainly on chick lit and some of the more goofy teen books. Just before Lockhart’s novel The Boyfriend List came out, a publicist was kind enough to send me a copy. I remember reading it and thinking, “This won’t do. This won’t do at all. It’s just not trashy enough. It’s too good.”

And as her career has progressed, Lockhart has proven to be extremely skilled in writing books that get to the heart of things. Important things, like why young women are so often treated like dolls rather than equals. Fly on the Wall, one of Lockhart’s other awesome books, examines some of these same issues with a clever twist in which the protagonist, Gretchen, turns into a fly after reading Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis, then spends most of her time on the wall in her high school’s boys’ locker room.

The Disreputable History takes Lockhart’s exploration further, and it’s not only an interesting dissection of teen social boundaries, it’s also a genuinely enjoyable read. Frankie’s pranks — which I’ll leave you to find out about for yourselves — are brilliant and funny and generally make you wish you could pull some of them off yourself.

In fact, I have to say that if it weren’t for the fact that this novel is pretty much perfect as it is, I would be begging for a sequel. Thanks, E., for sharing such an awesome story with us.

Oh, and if you haven’t already gotten yourself a copy? Do so immediately. I mean, even Oprah says to read it. So hurry up, and then come tell me what you think.

Much love,
brina

Chains by Laurie Halse Anderson

November 12th, 2008

Laurie Halse Anderson has done it again. The author of Speak — a book I highly recommend you read if you haven’t already — has now written a truly terrific novel about the American Revolution.

Oh, no. That, again, you say? As if you haven’t already spent enough time memorizing dates and places and learning about tea parties in Boston. As if you want to hear another tale about lobsterbacks and the heroism of our founding fathers. Well, guess what? This … is not about that.

No, this story is about Isabel, a teenage slave who becomes the property of a wealthy New York family when her owner dies. It’s about a young woman who has no allegiance to rebels or loyalists, who is caught up in a war that offers to freedom to others, but not to her.

I have to say I learned a lot from this book — it’s chock full of New York history, stories about how the war impacted people right here in my hometown. And it’s also a wonderfully told chronicle of those who want to be free. Loyalists, rebels, women, children: no one in this novel is having an easy time of it. Laurie’s characters, even the more villainous ones, are multi-faceted, and did I mention that her research is exquisite? Because it really is.

Oddly, this title is listed as middle-grade fiction. I’m not slamming middle-grade stuff, not at all. Indeed, there are times when I wish I could read and review everything, because I do get quite a bit of middle grade fiction that is worthwhile. But I’m surprised because I think this is a book that will resonate with the YA audience and even with an adult audience. It’s smart, and detailed, and moving … and it is not at all “young.” In fact, one of the thoughts that has stayed with me since I read Chains is that it would be a perfect book to use in the classroom. I could see it being taught in ninth grade English, and I could see students really learning from it.

But alas. I am not a curriculum expert, or even a teacher (although I do tutor high school seniors who are working on college admission essays … but that really isn’t quite the same). Still, if I had the opportunity, I would recommend this tome to teachers all over the US. Indeed, I’d buy copies for every eighth grade history teacher and ninth grade English teacher and pray that some of them would use it in class.

Laurie’s book is most certainly in my top five for 2008. I’ve decided not to make a formal top five list, because there have been so many fantastic books this year. But seriously? Chains is one of the best YA books I’ve ever read, not just one of the best books I’ve read this year. It’s fantastic, and kudos to Laurie for exploring the domestic, female, under-appreciated side of the American Revolution.

Much love,
brina

PS. Oh, and more proof this book rocks? It’s a finalist for the 2008 National Book Award. Yay, Laurie!

Vibes by Amy Kathleen Ryan

November 10th, 2008

Amy Kathleen Ryan has written a fabulous book chock full of phrases that make me want to hop out of my chair and shout joyously. Indeed, I’m sorry it’s taken me this long to review Vibes, because I loved it from the moment I got it.

I only have the galley (meaning the version I read was not the final version), but before I even tell you what the story is about I want to present my favorite sentence in the book, which I hope was not edited out:

Video games were invented by demons riding dragons through the depths of a computer-generated hell rendered with excellent graphics so that I can see every drop of my blood on their three-pronged spears.

Now, while I personally have a great affinity for some video games, I love how Amy paints a picture with her words. And how her protagonist, Kristi, so often expresses her dissatisfaction with phrases telling us “X was invented by …” These particular gems are witty and vivid and not overused.

So. The book. It’s about a girl who thinks she’s psychic. She hears other people’s thoughts. And what she hears is basically that everyone hates her, or that members of the opposite sex can think of nothing but her breasts. Kristi goes to one of those high schools we encounter often in books but rarely in real life: a wacky alternative place where the students sit around in a circle at “morning meeting” and have a principal who is an endearing but completely nutty aging hippy. Kristi hates it, mostly because she is a misanthrope and hates everyone because she believes they hate her.

Of course it doesn’t turn out that way in the end, but I won’t tell you anything else lest I spoil it for you. Okay, just a bit: Vibes is one of those books that uses a supernatural theme without being the least bit supernatural. I’d place it more in the category of angsty teen chick lit — which, of course, is my very favorite category.

It’s a super-fun book, Vibes is. And just think: this is my first post back, and this is the first recommendation I’m making. Which is to say, if you are in the mood for something funny, smart and light-hearted, you should go grab Amy’s book. If you’re not in the mood for something funny, witty and light-hearted, you’ve obviously lost your bearings and should go read Amy’s book anyway.

Much love,
brina

Obama, Twilight, Seacrest, and yes, finally … some Nick and Norah thoughts!

November 6th, 2008

 

Hi guys, it’s Jami B. again.

I did some Nancy Drew style sleuthing and uncovered a link to the Ryan Seacrest/Obama interview that I mentioned in my last post right here.

If you’re curious, The Seacrest also does daily readings on his morning show from Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight, in anticipation of the upcoming film release. There are links to some of his recent reading passages on the same webpage if you scroll a bit. Good for a chuckle, since he has some colorful commentary.

And finally, I’d like to get some thoughts about Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist off my chest. I had high hopes for this film. The novel, coauthored by Rachel Cohn and David Levithan, is pretty kickass. Like seriously. Kick. Ass. Reading. So the suggestion that some Hollywood studio might smear this adorable, yet meaty book with bubblegum pop music and cheescake tween idol actors really gave me pause. What if they f’ed it up? Really, I was concerned.

I’ve seen the movie, though, and it’s actually pretty good. Its not 100 percent accurate to the book, but it does get the important stuff right. As a screenwriter who loves YA books, I was ready to roast this film if need be, but it’s really been done right. The lead actors (Michael Cera and Kat Dennings) deliver spot on, emotionally real performances as the titular Nick and Norah. The soundtrack, of course, is respectable. And the big diffs — including edits to the Tris and Caroline characters — mostly result in more laughs for the audience or help to trim bulky plotlines to make the 2 hour movie work. I also just liked it because the chemistry between the two leads totally crackled, and that’s how it comes off in the book! Finally, a movie that gets it! GETS that they have to make the audience feel what it feels like to be living-reading-breathing it as if you’re on your own night-in-the-life of adventure!

Bottom line: It’s a good adaptation, because it gets the feelings and tone of the book down pat. In Hollywood, that’s almost unheard of. So bravo Columbia Pictures, director Peter Sollett, and screenwriter Lorene Scafaria. Let’s hope others follow your lead and we get more great page to screen adaptations like Nick and Norah and a lot less like … City of Ember.

Election night with YA

November 4th, 2008

We’re still gone fishing, but you should seriously consider spending election night at the liveblog at YA for Obama.